Seeking for Righteousness |
|
|
The personal and political blog of Kaimi Wenger
About Kaimi
My e-mail: kaimipono -at- wengerfamily.com E-mail Policy I'm proud to donate to
Selected Writings Slavery as a Takings Clause Violation, 53 American University Law Review 191 (2003) Nullificatory Juries (with David A. Hoffman) (Wisconsin Law Review, forthcoming 2004) Downward Departure Handbook Basic Information about Law Review Submissions THE BLOGROLL My Group Blog Times and Seasons Daily Stops New York Times How Appealing Slate InstaPundit Volokh Conspiracy Drudge New York Law Journal Sub Judice Frequent Visits Kausfiles Nate Oman Lawrence Solum Brian Leiter Easterblogg The Chicken Weeklies (mostly) The New Republic Atlantic Monthly The Weekly Standard The Nation The American Prospect Sometime Stops Talking Points Andrew Sullivan John Rosenberg TalkLeft Lessig Crooked Timber TAPPED Eve asparagirl Ox Blog Michael Froomkin Declan McCullagh Atrios Taint A Few More LDS Blogs Metaphysical Elders A Soft Answer LDS Citizen Dustin the Legal Guy More Law-Related Blogs Stuart Buck Rick Hasen Jack Balkin Statutory Construction Current Terror Alert Level Archives |
Sunday, April 18, 2004
Friday, March 26, 2004
Hello all, I have moved my law blogging to the small group blog over at www.tutissima.com . I can be found blogging on law and on political issues over there. I will continue to blog on religious issues over at www.timesandseasons.org . I will leave this blog open, in the event I need to go back to individual blogging at some point. But there will be no posts in the foreseeable future -- I expect to be doing all of my blogging at tutissima or Times and Seasons. Monday, March 08, 2004
A sad law review tale Two years ago, while I was clerking, I had a great idea for a law review article. It was clever; it was innovative; it was a nice, moderate compromise in a thorny area of scholarship, but also a radical new way of looking at things. It was related to an exciting area of law, and it was something I believed was a good idea. Of course, as with any clever-new-idea article, I did a pre-emption check. No one else had written about this -- it was my idea. And so I sat down and wrote. I wrote an outline, and eventually about 20 pages of text. I compiled stacks of research. The article was coming into shape. The underlying idea even made it into case law: I wrote up a quick sketch of the idea as it related to a case we had; the judge liked it, and the sketch ended up being integrated into a published opinion, an opinion that I really liked. Around this time, other things began cropping up. I had cases to juggle and other academic projects I was working on. I don't recall exactly why or how, but the article was back-burnered. And once it was back-burnered, it was forgotten. I set the draft down in December of 2001, and there it sat for two years. Not that I was being idle. In the interim, I started a new job, watched my daughter's birth, and published two other articles. I occassionally remembered the piece, but it remained back-burnered. A recent high-profile case brought the issue back into the spotlight, and I thought about finishing the article. More recently, I decided I really needed to send out a piece for this Spring season. And so I re-motivated myself. I dusted off the article draft, and it still looked good. Of course, it still needed work, so I got to work. Every spare minute of the past few weeks was devoted to writing, re-writing, re-acquainting myself with my pile of research. I was aiming to have a draft ready to send to colleagues by this week -- an ambitious goal, but made easier by the 20 pages already done. I felt the academic juices flowing; I was on a roll. It belatedly occurred to me that my pre-emption check was over two years old. To be specific, it occurred to me this afternoon. I immediately hopped onto Westlaw, and made the sad discovery: Someone else had already written my article. It's a good article. It was a symposium piece, and it's gotten attention from others in the field (I knew the idea was good!). Alas, it doesn't have my name on it. At the moment, I'm in a kind of post-discovery shock. I'm fully aware that I had a chance, and I blew it. The dates make clear that, had I finished the piece for the Spring 2002 season, I would have been the first or tied-for-first to publish this idea (the other piece has a December 2002 date). As it is, I can remind myself that I had the thought first, because it is still in the published opinion -- but that's poor consolation. I'm contemplating my options now. I may end up switching gears with existing research and draft, and trying to make it into a "put a new spin on Professor Z's idea" rather than a "look at this new idea" article. I don't know that that will be successful, and in any case, that would be a less impressive, less important article. It's more likely that I will drop this particular project entirely for now, and switch to trying to get another half-started draft finished in the next weeks. This experience hasn't been particularly pleasant (though better to note pre-emption now than later). And this has also made me reiterate an old note-to-self: Write up your ideas! Get them in finished form, and get them out there to be published. And so, with that thought, I'll close this blog post, and get to work. Wednesday, January 28, 2004
On the Recent Lack of Posts Yes, I have not been posting as regularly in recent months as I was able to do previously. This has been the result of two factors. First, I have been very busy at work, and at home. Second, most of the free time I have had for blogging has gone to new posts and comments at my group blog, Times and Seasons, which is becoming a very fun intellectual and religious environment for me. That said, I'm not going to let my solo blog wither away completely. I plan to continue posting here on law- and politics-related topics as time permits. Tuesday, January 27, 2004
Spam again Recently, spammers have started adding nonsense text (random words) to try to get past spam filters. I just received one example that I thought was funny -- they included so many random words that the message (something about credit card debt, apparently) is all but incomprehensible! The message read: vocabularyJust a way to CANCEL your DEBT.kept luftwaffe realtor tanager cityscape aft chancel beyond convey horace aggrieve redcoat dishevel diadem delicious flintlock acs scarsdale sibilant chiefdom kiva waive airline cranberry lung 100% Money Back Guarantee.alex tycoon delphi bacilli angola operatic omission synonym crevice permitting cottonseed badge limerick benefice lamarck salubrious andean usher dar decade temperance coprinus inexplainable indestructible scramble tassel waxy commute bellyache clayton yeoman true hepatica adventure ditch malarial No Bankruptcy. No Loans. No Negative Credit Report.peptide shelby hancock kaiser conundrum monolith mortar byrne ascribe councilmen buttermilk dank saxophone featherbedding ridgway smooth herringbone polymorph bromide carboxy elaborate pipe cramp comrade belies tambourine adaptive analyses treadmill fallacy canvasback boric tutelage demarcate patio drown crestfallen Stop ALL Collections and Harassment Calls.emblazon form roundabout agony captor neuroanatomy leadsman r transalpine burgher corrupt declamation comparative convoke upheaval mcgregor electronic hillock assemble follow climatology phlox underclassman evildoer medusa dub shinto rail council imperil decreeing vault beset Eliminate your debt in appox. 120 days with no problems!anthropomorphic devon vertices sockeye arbiter relate chestnut hurst inscription virginia beauty nuclei chalcocite crown lyman bromley aye electrocardiograph nourish ames tenterhooks btl betrothal blandish despondent superior This includes your personal debt, bank loans, and credit card debt.dewdrop detonate asheville pratt blather foliage drench dressy holloway coleman derrick addict beat ambition rex antietam vacillate maggoty wrote melodramatic tactile desecrate baby Full disclosure and information will be given to you before you decide.dilettante bullwhack album demultiplex bestowal zigging placeholder syllabi committing intuitive metallurgist o's beatitude triptych nail brookside We have successfully Eliminated debt for 1000's of customers,flemish beget fest braniff citron evenhanded shave caruso candle amphibious dosimeter bestselling broadcast warmonger sleety afghan lansing lovelace liaison I have to wonder about people who get this kind of message and don't know that the extra words are just anti-filtering additions. They are probably scratching their heads, wondering "What in the heck does this mean?" Now that's the way to sell something -- totally confuse the customer! Monday, December 29, 2003
LOTR quiz Yep, yet another silly online quiz. Thankfully, it's short. However, it's a particularl annoying one to answer -- most of the options are really wierd. Anyway, I am: ![]() Congratulations! You're Gandalf! Which Lord of the Rings character and personality problem are you? brought to you by Quizilla Tuesday, December 16, 2003
Happy (belated) Blogiversary! The statutory construction zone turned one year old a few days ago. That's time enough for a lot of statutes to be constructed! Happy blogiversary! (Note: He also has a nifty article coming out soon about -- what else? -- statutory construction). |